The Hazards of Publishing Your Contact Information
 

Welcome to Jestertunes! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Feel free to leave a comment, read through the archives, and enjoy yourself. See you again real soon!

If you’re observant, you probably noticed that a few days ago I added a section to my sidebar called “Interact With Me” that shows my online status on AOL Instant Messenger, Yahoo Messenger and Skype. I like the idea of people being able to instantly speak with me outside of comments.

The first person to take advantage of this new feature was not a friend or regular reader. It was yet another bigot in a long line of them who wants to cure me of my awful gay disease. Figures!

I got home from rehearsal tonight and was instantly greeted with the following conversation:

willanderson50
hey there jester! In looking at you, you do look like a “Little Girl”

Jester
excuse me?

willanderson50
I said in looking at your pic on your site, I can see why you think you’re a “Little Girl”

… I have no idea what you are talking about. I don’t think I’ve ever referred to myself as a “little girl.” as I’m neither little, nor a girl.

I would agree that you are not a little girl, but whenever a man prefers to take a penis in his ass, then in my book he’s acting like a little girl!

You assume much.

I only assume what YOU have written on YOUR site my friend.

I can assure you I have never written that I prefer to take a penis in my ass.

May I ask you very SINCERELY, do you really believe that you’re Gay by Birth?

Yes, sincerely, gay by birth. I was not molested. I was not the victim of an overbearing mother and an absent father.

Jester man, I promise you that something went amiss that has confused you!

Are you attempting to take me up on my challenge to make an argument against homosexuality that does not evoke some spiritual text as its basis?

I am absolutely certain that God never intended for a man to put his penis into another man (or woman for that matter) behind. That place is purely for elimination of toxic human waste!

If that’s the case, William Anderson, why must you insist on keeping that long stick in yours?
Why does what I do in the privacy of my home offend you so much?

No, there’s no stick in my ass, but I’m deeply concerned that you prefer to have one in yours!

Well, Will. I appreciate your concern. And as long as I have so many strangers praying for my mortal soul, I figure I’m pretty well covered.

[ Snip insistence on the existence of God and the "sexual compatibility of men and women"]

*yawn* You’ve obviously not read much of my site. You’re going to have to do MUCH better than this to impress me.

My goal is/was not impress you, but to simply challenge your thinking.

Well you haven’t. Your arguments are nothing I haven’t heard before, and are easily dismissed. I suggest you start with the Dear Mr Cooper Series and go from there.

LEt me ask you, are you equally attracted to women?

I’m glad that you have the spiritual crutch that you need to get through life. I don’t begrudge you that at all. However, you can not and will not convince me that your idea of GOD is the truth. Not going to happen. And as long as you fail to do that, you can never prove that the supposed “word of God” is the law. And no, I’m not attracted to women.

So, a woman’s vagina wouldn’t turn you on?

Not in the slightest.

Have you ever tried it?

Yes I have.

And the experience?

Was dreadful.

Dreadful for you or her?

for me. She had a great time.

That proves my point. There is something “abnormal” about a man who finds having sex with a woman dreadful, but to play the role of a woman as a man is acceptable is just plain crazy!

What is “abnormal” is that you seem to be so personally invested in my sex life.

[Snip more "God is a fact" and "God is the CREATOR."]

You are saying that no one can argue that there is a CREATOR?
Explain people who are born with both sex organs.
Explain people who are born with “ambiguous” organs.
And you are saying sex is ONLY for the purpose of reproduction?
How are those 40 kids working out for you?

Sure, you can argue, but no matter what your conclusions are, you still can’t refute in reality that there is a God! That’s like people who say that Hitler didn’t slaughter the Jews. Even if one were to take that position, the evidence clearly points to that historical fact!

You’re right, there is EVIDENCE that Hitler slaughtered the Jews. There is NO EVIDENCE that God exists.

Sex is for pleasure between a man and his wife, also for the purpose of intimacy that brings a man and a woman together spiritually and of course for pro-creation.

I find it incredibly sad that so many of your brethren have abdicated their ability to think critically or scientifically about the “facts” that your religion has shoved down your throat.

[Snip the asinine "Intelligent Design" argument.]

Ask the scientists to explain the so-called Big Bang theory; I promise you that they cannot! And neither can you!

Well, any explanation they have beats the idea of some bearded man in the sky who says some magic words and waves his arms around creating everything in the universe.

So, your body just knows when to do different things? Who’s idea it was to make us male and female? Did a big bang just arbitrarily make us different races, ethnicities, colors, and cultures? Come on, surely you’re smarter than that?

I am. I’m in doubt that you are. Millions and MILLIONS of years of adaptation and mutation, not one instant of TA-DA! There’s a human.

[Snip scripture quotes]

Someday you will stand before the God of the universe to give an account of how you lived, your relationship to Him thru His Son, Jesus Christ! What will you do?

I will wait for the buzz to wear off.

Its funny that the Bible gives us the reason why people like yourself reject God or the knowledge of God. It is because “Men Loved Darkness Rather than Light, and do not Come to the Light Lest their Evil Deeds Should be Exposed.”

While this has been extremely fascinating and enlightening, I must bid you adeiu. I have a Mormon in a pot on the stove, and those 8 year olds aren’t going to molest themselves, you know. Have a great night, and thanks for visiting my site.

24 Responses to “The Hazards of Publishing Your Contact Information”
 

I am just in awe. I can’t believe you have people who are so invested in your sex life. Shit. Do you have paparazzi too???

Miss Britt wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 10:01 am

 
 

He says you’re a little girl because you take it in the ass, but later says that girls aren’t supposed to take it in the ass.

What is it?

othurme wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 10:17 am

 
 

Miss Britt - I’m not sure you could call him paparazzi, since he doesn’t ever sell the photos to the tabloids. I’ve posed in front of the windows topless enough, I figured it would happen by now.

Othurme - I was disturbed by his overuse of the word “little.” He never answered any of the questions I asked him, either. He couldn’t explain hermaphrodites, etc etc. I’d be a lot more willing to believe in their idea of God if only He could pick better spokespeople.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 1:58 pm

 
 

Hey Jester:

I had no idea that you were that affected by our conversation on last evening. Wow! I must of struck a nerve indeed. The one thing that immediately stands out about most Gay people is their “self-condemnation” and the fact that deep inside, they really abhor themselves! In fact, one former Gay man I know, who was converted to Christianity and who had spent many years trying to justify his actions, admitted those very words to a classroom full of Law Students at Southwestern Law School in LA. That’s heavy.

Will

William Anderson wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 2:51 pm

 
 

William Anderson - The only thing about our conversation that struck a nerve was your refusal to answer any of the questions that I asked you.

You have not “made your case.” You have not “proved your point.”

All you have done is proven yourself to be a bigoted loudmouthed asshole.

I am appalled by your use of the phrase “former Gay man who converted to Christianity.” As though homosexuality is some sort of aberrant religious belief, or otherwise inconsistent with Christian beliefs.

Get a new hobby, do something actually beneficial for the world. Take up an environmental cause, since the entire world is destroying the Earth that your God so lovingly and magically “created.” Plus, you’ll have actual SCIENCE on your side.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 3:00 pm

 
 

Jester:

You STILL don’t get it! I am totally not trying to prove anything to you. See, “Truth” is not predicated on who believes it or not, it can stand on its own! We find absolutley nowhere in Scripture where God is trying to prove to mankind that He exists! Absolutely nowhere! Therefore, I suggest you move on from that cause the argument is really mute.

William Anderson wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 3:04 pm

 
 

Jester:

And for the record, being Gay (sexually perverted) is TOTALLY inconsistent with the values and principles of Christianity; that is why you guys hate Christians so much! And yet, the sad truth is it is only because deep inside your heart and spirit, you KNOW that something is wrong!

William Anderson wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 3:06 pm

 
 

William Anderson - There is apparently some disconnect in your brain. You SEEM to understand the concept of scientific facts, but then you apply them to a mythology and hocus-pocus and pretend you’ve said something profound. By the way, the word you are looking for is “moot” not “mute.” And the point is NOT moot.

Scripture ≠ Fact

Scripture = Fables

I don’t know what Bible you are reading, but the one that I read says there are no degrees of sin. Adultery, eating pork, murder, and theft are all on equal footing. So it seems by your reasoning, that if you have ever done any of the things the Bible says are sins, then you are not really a Christian, either…

And since babies are born with Original Sin, there are no true Christians.

Your reasoning sucks.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 3:20 pm

 
 

Jester:

I am well aware of what the correct word is; I intentionally used the word “Mute” to inform you that I wasn’t hearing you on the matter you tried to speak to..simply because I’ve heard all of those non-sense arguments before! And since you are probably biblically illiterate, you wouldn’t know this, but the Bible does in fact make a difference in sin and the consequences of them.

A case in point would be homosexuality; where God says that it is an “ABOMINATION”. That word comes from a Hebrew word that means “That which God hates Most.”

William Anderson wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 3:51 pm

 
 

Jester - someone’s got a crush on you. He’s so infatuated with you he can’t stop thinking about you. He can’t get on with his life until he finds someone that will bend him over and give to him the way he thinks “little girls” are supposed to get it.

Maybe once he got it the way he really wanted it, he’ll be able to stop writing all over your blog…the surest sign of his man crush on you.

othurme wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 4:10 pm

 
 

William Anderson - You know what people who make generalized statements about a person without knowing anything about them are called?

Bigots.

I am certainly not “biblically illterate.” I am fascinated by religions and have studied nearly every major world religion.

And you should seriously do your research a bit more thoroughly. “Abomination” is not a hebrew word. The word didn’t even exist until the 14th century:

“abomination”
c.1325, “feeling of disgust, hatred, loathing,” from O.Fr. abomination, from L. abominationem (nom. abominatio) “abomination,” from abominatus, pp. of abominari “shun as an ill omen,” from ab- “off, away from” + omin-, stem of omen (see omen). Meaning intensified by folk etymology derivation from L. ab homine “away from man,” thus “beastly.” Abominable snowman (1921) translates Tibetan meetaoh kangmi.

Here’s a factual CITATION:

“abomination.” Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian. 23 Apr. 2007. Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/abomination.

Interesting that homosexuality didn’t rate a commandment.

This word is used, (1.) To express the idea that the Egyptians considered themselves as defiled when they ate with strangers (Gen. 43:32). The Jews subsequently followed the same practice, holding it unlawful to eat or drink with foreigners (John 18:28; Acts 10:28; 11:3).

(2.) Every shepherd was “an abomination” unto the Egyptians (Gen. 46:34). This aversion to shepherds, such as the Hebrews, arose probably from the fact that Lower and Middle Egypt had formerly been held in oppressive subjection by a tribe of nomad shepherds (the Hyksos), who had only recently been expelled, and partly also perhaps from this other fact that the Egyptians detested the lawless habits of these wandering shepherds.

(3.) Pharaoh was so moved by the fourth plague, that while he refused the demand of Moses, he offered a compromise, granting to the Israelites permission to hold their festival and offer their sacrifices in Egypt. This permission could not be accepted, because Moses said they would have to sacrifice “the abomination of the Egyptians” (Ex. 8:26); i.e., the cow or ox, which all the Egyptians held as sacred, and which they regarded it as sacrilegious to kill.

(4.) Daniel (11:31), in that section of his prophecies which is generally interpreted as referring to the fearful calamities that were to fall on the Jews in the time of Antiochus Epiphanes, says, “And they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.” Antiochus Epiphanes caused an altar to be erected on the altar of burnt-offering, on which sacrifices were offered to Jupiter Olympus. (Comp. 1 Macc. 1:57). This was the abomination of the desolation of Jerusalem. The same language is employed in Dan. 9:27 (comp. Matt. 24:15), where the reference is probably to the image-crowned standards which the Romans set up at the east gate of the temple (A.D. 70), and to which they paid idolatrous honours. “Almost the entire religion of the Roman camp consisted in worshipping the ensign, swearing by the ensign, and in preferring the ensign before all other gods.” These ensigns were an “abomination” to the Jews, the “abomination of desolation.” This word is also used symbolically of sin in general (Isa. 66:3); an idol (44:19); the ceremonies of the apostate Church of Rome (Rev. 17:4); a detestable act (Ezek. 22:11).

Here’s another CITATION:

“abomination.” Easton’s 1897 Bible Dictionary. 23 Apr. 2007. Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/abomination.

You’re boring me. Move along, and again, thank you for visiting my site.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 4:15 pm

 
 

Othurme - that’s why I was trying to get him hooked up with Wayne Cooper… oooo!!!!

Their hyphenated name would be Anderson-Cooper!!!

AWESOME!!!

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 4:24 pm

 
 

Jester:

Wrong again! The word Abomination in the Bible is a hebrew word my dear, and yes, you are biblically illiterate! The mere fact that you have “studied” world religions doesn’t qualify you to be considered a student of Scripture. Othurme is apparently fascinated with all of us as he has entered another conversation. Oh, is that what you girls..oh, I’m sorry, guys do to help each other? And yes, once your girlfriend has had Ms. Hilton’s Vagina around his penis, he’d say “bye-bye” jesterboo. Or perhaps Othurme could take his place. :-)

William Anderson wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 4:46 pm

 
 

Wee Willy - don’t worry, someday your minister will give it to you the way you like it. A straight injection of “The Word of God”.

othurme wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 5:06 pm

 
 

[...] othurme: Wee Willy - don’t worry, someday your minister will give it to you the way you like it. A straight injection of “The Word of… [...]

Jestertunes » A First for this Blog wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 5:13 pm

 
 

William Anderson - I just gave you a source citation of the etymology of the word “abomination” and you still insist that the word is Hebrew.

Preserving a belief despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary is one of the definitions of “insanity.”

Othurme is straight. He won’t be replacing my boyfriend anytime soon.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 5:53 pm

 
 

I can’t believe I read the whole thing.

By the way, I must be in the minority. I do not think Young Simmons is hot. Is my radar off? I’ll tell you a young’un I do find extra sexy is that guy who plays Superman on Smallville. I never watch the show, but I love watching that guy! It’s that whole blue-eyed man of steel thing, I guess. That and the fact that I know he could pick my fat ass up without straining.

Liz wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 5:57 pm

 
 

Liz - Do you need a Tums?

Your radar must be a bit off. I haven’t found any really good pictures of Nick Simmons to post.. but if you tune into Gene Simmons Family Values on A&E and watch it, you’ll be in love with him too.

Oh yeah, Tom Welling is super hot. I have a great photo of him in KISS makeup that might be the hottest thing I’ve ever seen.

Funny.. I didn’t realize I had such an affinity for KISS. I’m not a big fan of the music… must be the theatrics.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 6:07 pm

 
 

You gotta wonder what’s up with Bible dude. He’s obsessed with your sex life–kind of like that Monk guy from TV, except with a computer. I’m not even that interested in MY OWN sex life! LOL

Julie wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 7:44 pm

 
 

Julie - Really? Cause the rest of us are interested in your sex life. Pictures and “blow by blow” descriptions if you would…

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 7:52 pm

 
 

So…um….I think I should go visit that dumb fuck.
I’ll show him my version of “the word of god”..I would be all “AMEN, BIATCH” HAHA…
What a fart…Thats the kind of guy that I would make out with my bf in front of so he’ll get a hard on and tell me i’m going to hell, while he masturbates to Justin Timberlake bringing sexy back! Gary Busey is smarter than this guy…ugh…

Branden wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 7:59 pm

 
 

Branden - Welcome! I’m glad you decided to finally say hi, I know you’ve been lurking around. ;)

Can you tell me exactly when you might be making out with your bf in public… and where?

Gary Busey is probably better looking, too.

jester wrote on April 23rd, 2007 at 8:03 pm

 
 

Mr. Anderson has now made me want to be gay so I can be included in such blind hatred.

Mathew 7
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

It must be hard to feel so holier than everyone else when you are constantly talking about people wanting to put objects in their rectum. A subject I have never noted jester to discuss here, and he is the gay one. (atleast openly)

Killer wrote on April 24th, 2007 at 8:24 am

 
 

Killer - I know a few guys that could help you out with that… they like bears. I don’t think William Anderson’s bible contains the book of Matthew.

He sure was reading heavily out of the Old Testament.

jester wrote on April 24th, 2007 at 2:39 pm

 

Say something already!